can India separate Balochistan from Pakistan?

Yes, it is very much possible. The below points will illustrate how it can be done.

1. A proxy war by Pakistan in two Indian provinces merely affects less than 10% of all Indian provinces, a proxy war by India in two Pakistani provinces can affect 40% of Pakistan.

2. Pakistan did not learn the lesson that those who live in glass houses should not throw stones.  Pakistan never thought that two could play the game; or else, they thought they could disintegrate India before India woke up.  Well, that was not the case.  India plans to take proxy wars into Pakistani territory, and pay Pakistan back in its own coin.  But let’s analyze how a proxy war may succeed, within Pakistan, in further points below. 

3. As experience around the world has shown, a successful proxy war that is able to cut off a part of a territory or initiate regime change in a country must consider four major parameters:

• The numerical size of the rebel army.
• The volume of external aid and military assistance actually provided to the rebels.
• The resolve and ability of the home army to resist the armed rebellion
• The physical presence of external military action by a foreign country.

For the current scenario that we are discussing:
(Home Army --> Pakistani Army)
(Rebel Army --> Baloch Rebels)
(Foreign Country --> Rep Of India)

4. Bullet points 1 and 2 are entirely in India's favor. There are many Baloch who hate being with Pakistan and they want to create their own Baloch nation. Also, the external aid by India has to be well directed and in huge numbers to the Baloch rebels. It was the same case while dealing with Mukti Bahini during the Bangladesh liberation war.

5. As the strength of the Baloch rebels increases and the external supply/aid from India keep on coming, the will of the Pakistani Army to continue their ops in Balochistan will take a hit. 

6. Now, the Pakistani Army will be fighting on three fronts. First, The Af-Pak region of Waziristan where the Pakistanis are conducting op Zarb-e-azb. Second, the line of control where India can put some pressure and make the Pakistani army move large number of troops to the Indian side. Third, the Baloch front wherein the war of independence is going on.

7. This three front stretch/war for the Pakistani army will eventually break their ability to do successful operations and they will naturally incur very heavy casualties. This therefore satisfies the 3rd bullet point(sub point of point 3) as mentioned above.

8. The 4th bullet point is naturally satisfied as the 1.15 million strong Indian Army will be standing by as a "physical presence" and an external military support to Balochistan. Also, the Indian intelligence agencies would have, by now, made deep inroads into Balochistan to satisfy bullet points 2 and 3 as mentioned above.

India In United Nationa

Consequences of Pakistan’s policy of sponsoring terrorism have spread beyond the region, India told the U.N. General Assembly, responding to Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s broadside against New Delhi on the situation in Jammu and Kashmir. India mounted a counter-attack hours after Mr. Sharif’s speech at the General Assembly, connecting Pakistan’s record of nuclear proliferation to its support of terrorism and the dangers it posed to global security.

“The world has not yet forgotten that the trail of that dastardly attack led all the way to Abbottabad in Pakistan,” said Eenam Gambhir, First Secretary, Permanent Mission of India at the U.N, referring to the September 11 terror strikes.

“The land of Taxila, one of the greatest learning centres of ancient times, is now host to the Ivy League of terrorism. It attracts aspirants and apprentices from all over the world.”

Pakistan responded immediately, reiterating Mr. Sharif’s position that the slain Hizbul Mujahideen commander Burhan Wani was the leader of an indigenous freedom movement. India did not exercise its second right to respond, because all that needed to be said was said in the first instance itself, according to Indian diplomats. UNGA procedures allow each country two rights of response.

‘Self-incrimination’

India’s response on the floor of the UNGA came after the Minister of State for External Affairs M.J. Akbar rebutted Mr. Sharif at a press conference. “We heard the glorification of a terrorist. Wani is declared commander of Hizbul, widely acknowledged as a terror group. It is shocking that a leader of a nation can glorify a self-advertised terrorist at such a forum. This is self-incrimination by Pakistan PM,” Mr. Akbar said.

“What we see in Pakistan, Mr. President, is a terrorist state, which channelises billions of dollars, much of it diverted from international aid, to training, financing and supporting terrorist groups as militant proxies against its neighbours,” Ms. Gambhir told the UNGA.

Not only that Pakistan supports terrorist groups, it also suppresses its own minorities and women and denies basic human rights to them while preaching human rights to others, the Indian representative said.

“We cannot and will not allow terrorism to prevail,” she said, adding that Indian actions were only to protect the human rights of its citizens from terrorism.

Pak. gets little support

Pakistan has sought to hard-sell its old position on Kashmir by using the current chaos and violence in the Valley, but it has got little international support.

“Pakistan has raised the issue of Kashmir at every UNGA meeting for almost seven decades. However, the last time the U.N. discussed the Kashmir issue was in 1957. Despite its raising the issue constantly, none of the other 192 countries in the U.N. has raised the Kashmir issue. All countries that responded to the recent attacks in Uri — from the U.S., the U.K., even Saudi Arabia and UAE [old allies of Pakistan] — spoke about the need to end terrorism — which is India’s position — and did not talk about human rights and self determination, which is Pakistan’s stand,” pointed out Aparna Pande, Director, Initiative on the Future of India and South Asia at Hudson Institute.

“Not much will come from a state that encourages or tolerates this kind of violence. The “border” is a de facto dispute, [but] Pakistan should be using its military power to stop new and threatening events, such as those pertaining to Islamic extremism,” said Prof. Stephen P. Cohen, Senior Fellow at Brookings.

Scholars also notice a tilt in America’s position, in favour of India, even as it tries to balance its relations with both the countries. “ … the U.S. now has good relations with India, but it should retain an interest in Kashmir, perhaps via private groups ... This seems paradoxical. It is a situation where the U.S. can help by staying somewhat aloof, but not withdrawing from Kashmir entirely,” said Mr. Cohen.

“Pakistan’s attempts to raise the Kashmir issue will not have any success in the international arena till the day that Pakistan stops supporting jihadi groups and ideologies,” said Ms. Pande.

“The U.S. is already playing a role primarily behind closed doors. Washington is doing what it has always done, lower the temperatures and prevent an escalation of conflict between two nuclear power countries. However, what is different this time round is that the U.S. has openly condemned the Uri attacks. As the readout of Secretary Kerry’s meeting with PM Sharif shows the U.S. sought to clarify that Washington condemned the attacks and unlike on earlier occasions did not link them to a resolution of the Kashmir dispute,” she pointed out.

India Vs Pak

India on Thursday called Pakistan a “terrorist state” and accused it of carrying out “war crimes” against Indians through its “long-standing policy” of sponsoring terrorism, hours after Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif raked up Kashmir issue at the U.N. General Assembly session.

In a strong rebuttal, India said the terrorists designated by the U.N. continued to roam Pakistan’s streets freely and operate with state support.

Exercising India’s Right of Reply to Mr. Sharif’s “long tirade” about the situation in the Indian State of Jammu and Kashmir, First Secretary in the Permanent Mission of India to the U.N. Eenam Gambhir said “the worst violation of human rights is terrorism.”

“When practised as an instrument of state policy it is a war crime. What my country and our other neighbours are facing today is Pakistan’s long-standing policy of sponsoring terrorism, the consequences of which have spread well beyond our region,” she said.

India sees in Pakistan “a terrorist state” that channelises billions of dollars, much of it diverted from international aid, to training, financing and supporting terrorist groups as militant proxies against it neighbours.

In a reference to JeM chief Masood Azhar and Mumbai terror attack mastermind Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi, Ms Gambhir said terrorist entities and their leaders, including many designated by the UN, continue to roam the streets of Pakistan freely and operate with state support.

“With the approval of the authorities, many terrorist organisations raise funds openly in flagrant violation of Pakistan’s international obligations,” she said.

Slams Pak. for glorifying Wani

While Pakistan’s nuclear proliferation record is marked by “deception and deceit,” it talks about restraint, renunciation and peace.

“Similar false promises it has made to us — the international community — on terrorism. Perhaps renunciation of lies and self-restraint on threats could be a good place for Pakistan to start,” Ms. Gambhir said.

India also strongly slammed Mr Sharif for glorifying Hizb-ul-Mujahideen terrorist Burhan Wani, who was killed on July 8 by the Indian forces.

“Even today we have heard support from the Prime Minister of Pakistan for a self-acknowledged commander of a known terrorist organisation,” she said.

She said Pakistan was a democracy deficit country and practises terrorism on its own people.

“It extends support to extremist groups, suppresses minorities and women and denies basic human rights, including through draconian laws,” she noted.

Ms. Gambhir voiced India’s firm resolve to protect all its citizens from all acts of terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir.

“We cannot and will not allow terrorism to prevail,” she said.

Ms. Gambhir reminded the UN that the trail of the most “horrifying” and “dastardly terror attack” of 9/11 led all the way to Abbottabad in Pakistan, where al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden was hiding for years and was killed by U.S. forces.

The 'Ivy League of terrorism'

She pointed out that the land of Taxila, one of the greatest learning centres of ancient times, “is now host to the Ivy League of terrorism” and attracts aspirants and apprentices from all over the world.

“The effect of its toxic curriculum are felt across the globe,” she said, adding that it wasironical that a country which had established itself as the global epicentre of terrorism, was preaching human rights and talks about the ostensible support for self-determination.

Ms. Gambhir said that shortly before Pakistan gave its “hypocritical sermons” in the world body, its envoy in New Delhi was summoned in the context of the most recent of the terror attacks in Uri that claimed 18 Indian lives.

“That terrorist attack is part of a trail of continuous flow of terrorists trained and armed by our neighbour and tasked to carry out terrorist attacks in my country,” she said.

Mr. Sharif raised the Kashmir issue with almost every world leader — including those from the US, the UK, Japan and Turkey — on Wednesday and sought their intervention to resolve the matter.

Google launches Allo

Google announced Duo and Allo at its IO event in May this year, one is a video calling app and the other a messaging app to put it simply. While Duo reached Android and iOS users last month, today the company has launched Allo for both the platforms. High on artificial intelligence, the Allo competes directly against WhatsApp and Facebook's Messenger app.

At first Allo appears to be just another messaging app, however, the smart messaging app, as Google calls it, does more than just texting with friends. The first striking feature that anyone would notice is the always available Google Assistant. The basic function of the Google Assistant is to guide you through the app's features. But it does much more than that. 

Google assistant throws a number of options towards you after a simple "What you can do?". Google Assistant helps you find hotels, flights, set reminders, alarm and also shows you top news in different categories. All the information shown by Google Assistant is based on the company's services like News, Weather, etc.

"The Google Assistant is the next chapter in a journey Google has been on for many years to assist people in their everyday lives. We're starting with a preview edition to show you just one way that your Assistant will work for you in chat," said Amit Fulay, group product manager, in an official blog post.

×

Another interesting feature in Google's Allo is Smart Reply. The Smart Reply learns from your texting patterns and shows quick, small replies to send back to your friend when busy. 

"If your friend sends you a photo of their pet, you might see Smart Reply suggestions like "aww cute!" And whether you're a "haha" or ":D" kind of person, Smart Reply will improve over time and adjust to your style, " said Fulay.

The messaging app also has features that are similar to other such apps like WhatsApp. It allows selfies, stickers, emojis, along with text formatting to some extent. A user can increase or decrease the size of text by simply dragging the send button up or down.

Allo doesn't have an overall encryption cover, however, the app offers an "Incognito Mode". Conversations made in incognito mode are encrypted end-to-end. The app also has features like discreet notifications and message expiration.

Packers and Movers Industry in India

In India every sector is on growth. The growth of the each sector depends on the each one. Like the growth comes in IT and Services Sector the Relocation in India and moving happening very fast. The growth in Service sector and IT Packers and Movers in India also Grow. If we talk about last 3 to 4 year the packers and movers services in India is not so much or we can say that people in India is not so much aware about the this packers movers. Now the people are more aware about the packers and movers word.

Growth of relocation services In India is grow more but this industry is not so much organized as they should. Household shifting is very delicate and need extra care for your valuable household shifting. If we talking about the organized way in this industry packers and movers are not register or they don’t have the professional labor or even they don’t have how to pack he household goods . Some packers and movers even not aware about what is the material required for packing and moving household goods.

Packers and Movers is not organized the people are suffering or facing many problem to getting the services like packers mover Delhi or any other city. Some time people hire the Movers and Packers in Delhi but they did not get the service according to the requirements of the services. People come in house they pack the household goods and load the household goods on lorry .but when we reach at the destination and ask to packers and movers where is my household goods. Some time number is not reachable or person who come to you home for packing and moving his office not exist in city.